Enables the creation of a single, clean entry point for the API.
Development Speed
No need for controllers or boilerplate code (though you can still organize mapped methods into files). A single method with fluent API extensions is sufficient.
Simplicity
Reduces the complexity of creating APIs.
Performance
With fewer layers of abstraction, it performs better compared to controller-based approaches.
Flexibility
Easily extend functionality for specific endpoints or endpoint groups by adding new extension methods.
Lightweight by Design
Minimal APIs have a smaller memory footprint, making them ideal for serverless environments or resource-constrained systems.
Built-in Support for OpenAPI/Swagger
Minimal APIs include built-in support for generating OpenAPI/Swagger documentation without requiring additional configuration or significant effort.
Cons
Maintenance and Readability
As the project grows, maintaining endpoints can become challenging.
Missing Funcionality
Compared to the classic controller-based approach, some features may be lacking. However, maintainers often introduce updates for Minimal APIs with every new release.
Learning Curve for Beginners
Developers coming from the traditional controller-based mindset might find the concept of organizing endpoints in Minimal APIs less intuitive initially.